Author Topic: Andy Hill Acquitted.  (Read 3142 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sneaky_Nikon

  • G8 Contact Group
  • Air Vice-Marshal
  • *
  • Posts: 1749
  • Gender: Male
  • Local Airport: EGAE/AA
  • Favourite Aircraft: Cold War jets
Andy Hill Acquitted.
« on: March 08, 2019, 11:13:28 AM »
Must say, I'm surprised.

Quote
Pilot Andrew Hill has been found not guilty of manslaughter over 2015 Shoreham Airshow crash, in which 11 people died.

Mr Hill's ex-military Hawker Hunter jet crashed on to the A27 in Sussex on 22 August 2015.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-47495885
« Last Edit: March 08, 2019, 11:14:06 AM by Sneaky_Nikon »
Architect, Architect. VENGEANCE one one on fours.....

Offline Andy H

  • Squadron Leader
  • *
  • Posts: 154
  • Gender: Male
  • Local Airport: City of Derry
  • Favourite Aircraft: F16
  • Camera Used: Sony A290
Re: Andy Hill Acquitted.
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2019, 01:00:31 PM »
I just seen this, was surprised myself.

Offline Angry Turnip

  • Global Moderator
  • Marshal of the Air Force
  • *****
  • Posts: 13980
  • Gender: Male
  • Local Airport: BFS
  • Favourite Aircraft: Hawker Hunter/Harrier
  • Camera Used: NIKON D7200
  • A-P.net Photos: 1
Re: Andy Hill Acquitted.
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2019, 03:50:41 PM »
I am also surprised by the outcome,but I hope this will be an end of the matter,although I doubt very much it will be.

Offline Sneaky_Nikon

  • G8 Contact Group
  • Air Vice-Marshal
  • *
  • Posts: 1749
  • Gender: Male
  • Local Airport: EGAE/AA
  • Favourite Aircraft: Cold War jets
Re: Andy Hill Acquitted.
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2019, 04:02:44 PM »
I genuinely thought they'd have him bang to rights.
I too expect we'll hear more.
Architect, Architect. VENGEANCE one one on fours.....

Offline smudge

  • G8 Contact Group
  • Marshal of the Air Force
  • *
  • Posts: 10436
  • Human Name: Andrew
  • Local Airport: EGAD PP:QK 360R:GOTNA
Re: Andy Hill Acquitted.
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2019, 04:43:11 PM »
It seems that the jury had to acquit him given that the judge told them that Mr Hill couldn't be held criminally responsible if he was suffering "cognitive impairment" ( presumably g-induced blackout )

Given that it was impossible to prove that one way or the other, they had to acquit.  "Beyond reasonable doubt" for a criminal trial.

I suppose it now passes to an inquest, which doesn't have to satisfy the same criteria or find criminal intent.
« Last Edit: March 08, 2019, 05:01:07 PM by smudge »